4/9 WWE Raw Rating

Discussion in 'RAW' started by Big Hoss Rambler, Apr 11, 2012.

  1. Thought the first hour would get more viewers than the second cuz of the opening segment.
     
  2. No one really knew about the opening segment until it happened so I don't see how that could have drawn tbh.
     
  3. Yah, but I thought a lot more people would be watching RAW since Lesnar returned last time and more people might wait for this week's RAW to see Lesnar.
     
  4. I'm surprised at the drop off since I thought a lot of people would be intrigued by Lesnar's return. Oh well, they deserved a lower rating because the show was shit
     
  5. True but I don't think he was advertised for this show, so they may have expected him to get a later segment again IDK tbh, never really bothered with ratings too much.
     
  6. He was advertised. It said it on the WWE.com and there were several reports posted about him being here.
     
  7. Reports on Dirtsheets aren't going to bring in casuals and I doubt WWE.com would. I'm talking like TV ads, which i don't think they had. Well at least I never saw them.
     
  8. http://www.wwe.com/events/wwe-presents-raw-supershow-18

    Yah, it wasn't on TV though. Still, I thought people would wanna see what's gonna happen in the next RAW. Oh well, Idgaf.
     
  9. Ratings isn't viewership people.

    The viewership went up in the second hour which now'adays is great for WWE as they went on a huge run of it dropping. The show itself was terribad and deserved a 2.X rating to be honest. I guarantee if we had the break downs it'd be drop after opening segment, rise in main event.
     
  10. Maybe ppl don't like Brock that much, hmm?
     
  11. No way is this Brock Lesnar failing to draw, lol.
     
  12. If anything, Brock's the reason that probably got the 3.0 rating from and the other .1 for other segments.