Backstage News On Who Within WWE Knew Undertaker’s Streak Was Ending!

Discussion in 'General WWE' started by Super Saiyan Goku, Apr 10, 2014.

  1. As previously reported, WWE referee Chad Patton, who served as the in-ring official for the Brock Lesnar vs. Undertaker match at WrestleMania XXX, was not aware that Lesnar was going over in the bout. As noted, he was actually told that Undertaker was supposed to win.

    As far as who else in the company knew ahead of time, that is hard to say. We can say for certain thatVince McMahon, Brock Lesnar, Undertaker, Paul Heyman, and likely Triple H and Stephanie McMahon all knew, but beyond that, it”s difficult to say.

    On the actual script for the show, no finish was listed for the Lesnar-Undertaker match. However, that wasn’t unusual, as other matches on the card did not have a finish listed on the script as well.

    According to reports, none of the agents who worked the show were aware that Undertaker was going to lose.

    It should be noted, that despite the claim that not many were aware of the finish, enough people, or the right people, must have known. There were two major online betting websites that had Lesnar an unbelievable underdog, nearly 50-to-1 by some odds, that switched to him being an actual betting favorite when the match hit the ring, indicating that a ton of “smart money” came in once the finish was determined and told to whomever was in the loop to know these kind of things.

    Source: http://www.sescoops.com/backstage-news-within-wwe-knew-undertakers-streak-ending/

    Try being the referee in that point in that match counting that 3.​
     
  2. Apparently referee Chad Patton, who was the official in the ring for the Brock Lesnar vs.Undertaker match at WrestleMania XXX, was not aware that Lesnar was going over in the bout. In fact, he was informed ahead of time that Undertaker was going to win the match.

    The rule given to all WWE officials, which came into play in this match, is that if a wrestler does not kick out at two, you go ahead with the count as if it were a legitimate pin in a legitimate competition.

    Another interesting note stemming from what will go down in history as one of the most famous matches of all-time, is that Lesnar privately whispered “thank you” in Undertaker’s ear following the three-count, expressing his gratitude for the honor that “The Dead Man” was bestowing upon him.

    Source: http://www.sescoops.com/referee-unaware-brock-lesnar-beating-undertaker-backstage-notes/
     
  3. Well, i doubt the ref was unaware but the quote can be true.
     
  4. As a comment in that place stated. Glad to see Brock expressing gratitude.

    It would be a real honor to beat the undertaker at wrestlemania. and Brock is a very lucky man.
     
  5. I saw that article earlier, and it's absolute bullshit. The article mentions that Chad Patton, the referee, waited before counting to three. I've replayed the pinfall count a good amount of times, and there is no hesitation at all from Patton.
     
  6. lol only a retard would believe this shit. What does WWE have to gain by lying to the ref about the finish?
     
  7. I doubt WWE treats any of it's matches as a real competition BTW. WWE caring about legitimacy? :awyeah:

    Undertaker most likely wanted to lose, i hate Bork Chops too but i bitched the first day or two but now i'm over it. It's been nearly a week and your still bitching, Stop.:bodallas:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. NEVER!
     
  9. Trolling....I'm fine with that :adr:
     
  10. NOT TROLL! THE STREAK SHOULD NEVER HAD ENDED!
     
  11. NEVER!
     
  12. why? Any old school wrestler would disagree with you.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. no everyone would agree with me!
     
  14. Why do you yell in everyone your posts? Butt hurt, annoying, troll you seem like the perfect fit for WZ :jericho:
     
  15. Why do you not accept facts? I'm curious.
     
  16. I NOT A FUCKIN TROLL ASSHOLE! I MAKE VIDEO WITH MY OWN FACE! SO FUCK OFF! UR THE TROLLER! EVERYONE THING STREAK SHOULD GO ON TO 22-0! SO FUCK OFF!
     
  17. there no fact! everyone though the streak should have gong on!
     
  18. Haha no. It shouldn't have, because then we'd get the same shit every year of "THE STREAK WILL LIVE ON OR WILL IT BE DEFEATED" build every WM season. It's redundant, I liked it when it wasn't about the streak, better yet the streak wasn't too prevalent. The streak should've ended, and it makes sense for Brock to end it, as I also wanted Brock to end it. Also, need I mention the fact that Brock is 4-0 against Taker.
     
  19. HE SHOULD HAVE RETIRE WITHE THE STREAK! when he had his last match he could just said he not retiring unbeating and then leave! IT NOT FUCKIN ROCKET SCEINCE ASSHOLE!
     
  20. You are simply wrong. One of the oldest rules of wrestling is you go out on your back. What is the point of winning your last match? Any wrestler who cares about the business wants to put someone over on their way out.
     
    • Like Like x 5