WrestleMania Backstage news on Wrestlemania XXX Main Event

Discussion in 'PPV's & Specials' started by Crayo, Jul 3, 2013.

  1. Bork vs Taker plz. Fuck Bork vs Rock
     
  2. Would prefer Cena/Taker tbh.
     
    • Like Like x 1

  3. If that means getting Rock/Bork, then no. I wouldn't mind Cena/Taker, but Rock/Bork would be awful. If anyone can force Brock into a pathetic match it's Rock.
     
  4. Another Wrestlemania headlined by part-timer shit! :yay: Can't wait!
     
    • Like Like x 1

  5. As I've said time and time again... we as the IWC need to just learn to stop getting hyped for Mania. It's not for us. It's for casuals, and even for non-wrestling fans in some ways moreso than it is for hardcore internet fans.
     
  6. Yeah I know, just giving the typical generic reply so nobody else has to. I probably won't bother watching it, just like this year. It's usually the worst show of the year

    Heard someone say that Vince sees 'Mania now as nothing more than a way to get new eyes to his product. It's a showcase show for the WWE, not the "penultimate PPV of the year and where all the big stuff happened" like it used to be.
     
  7. I would rather have Triple H vs. Brock IV other than Brock vs. Rock.
     
  8. I wished Taker/Lesnar happened this year. But in the case of Rock not wrestling and Taker not hanging them up yet, then Taker/Lesnar was always the obvious alternative. Taker even said in an interview in March that he wants to face Lesnar at a Wrestlemania one day. Undertaker/Cena is so much better for the 30th Wrestlemania though, but I guess Taker may indeed be trying to go to 25-0... Disappointing.

    If a newer guy got a shot at the streak though, I could see Bray Wyatt being a dark opponent for Undertaker. Undertaker up against a twisted and demented cult leader sounds entertaining. The only flaw there is that while the build sounds good, the match itself might not be. I know match quality doesn't mean much for the casuals, but Taker's had the best (or second best) match of every Wrestlemania since Wrestlemania 23/24. Giving the best or one of the best performances of the night is clearly one of Taker's motivations for Wrestlemania at this point (JR talked about this in an interview), and I don't see being able to get one out of him against Wyatt. From what I know about Bray Wyatt's ring work, he's not typically someone you'd expect match of the year from. Same goes for a Taker/Ambrose match, likely.
     
  9. Well, an ideal scenario for me would have Lesnar vs someone from the full time roster, but let's forget that. Lesnar/Taker looks good, would've preferred Cena/Taker but no harm.
     
  10. I don't like either of those matches. I won't pay to see 'Mania if Lesnar/Taker or Bork/Rock is the main event. I will search the results the day after 'Mania. WWE knows how to make me go to sleep.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. "Let's put part timers in the main event of WrestleMania because they used to be a draw big when they worked full time,fuck the guys that work their ass off all year,we'll put them in dark matches and opening segments." WWE logic in a nutshell.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. Lets not get carried away here.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Id rather see Yoshi Tatsu vs Great Khali in a who can speak American match.
     
    • Like Like x 1

  14. Dude Brock vs Rock would be terrible. Brock needs somebody who can work a stiff, hard hitting match. Rock needs to work with a fellow sports entertainer. They are oil and water.

    I would rather see Bork/HHH 14 than Bork/Rock I
     
  15. I'm just saying, I don't want to see either of those matches.
     
  16. Nobody does but HHH/Bork is the lesser of those two enormous evils
     

  17. Brock/Rock II, you mean. Brock/Rock I was Summerslam 2002 and it was a great match. I seriously doubt they'd be able to pull off an equally good match in 2014, though.