Just for the moment, put aside what you personally feel about the decision to have Brock Lesnar end the Streak at Wrestlemania XXX. Just accept that it happened but consider the following hypothetical situation - Lesnar ending the Streak at Wrestlemania 29 instead of this year. Imagine how much better Lesnar's booking would have been if this had happened: He comes in and destroys Cena (even if he lost), goes over Triple H cleanly, and then kills the Streak in his very first Wrestlemania since being back. Hell, just pretend that he went over Cena too, since that would have been the right booking decision to make anyway. I can't imagine what could have made him look more invincible than going over Cena, Triple H and the Undertaker in back-to-back clean victories. He could have either eaten his first loss at Wrestlemania XXX this year, or they could have found a way to keep him undefeated all the way till Wrestlemania 31. Plus, Undertaker would have had twenty straight victories before taking his first loss (not that it's a big deal, but I like 20-1 better than 21-1.) I know there's a couple of things to consider; They wanted Taker to defend his Streak at the big 30th anniversary of the show, plus maybe they couldn't be sure that Lesnar would stay committed past WM29. But still.