News #CancelWWENetwork

Discussion in 'General WWE' started by Lackin, Jan 26, 2015.

?
  1. Yes - Fuck it

    22.2%
  2. No

    77.8%
  3. Dunno

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. It's news kinda

    NEWS ARTICLE

    What do you think about this article?
    Would you cancel the network over the RR?
     
  2. I think fans take this shit too seriously.
    These fans are quitters just like CM Punk.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. [​IMG]
     
  4. I still have hope of them turning things around. I also think the WWE Network is a brilliant idea and I'd hate to see it ruined.

    However, while I am not ready to abandon ship I'm intrigued to see if this cancellation movement is successful.
     
  5. Why would people want to pay for a product that they don't want? WWE are all about the money, so surely by taking that away from them (to an extent) it might help them to book things a little better in future.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Personally I love the network, especially seeing as how last year I spent £75 on 5 PPV's and most of them were shit. So if I pay £120 a year for it, and i get all WWE Programming and PPV's on demand well then that's a no brainer for me.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. I don't consider PPV's all that the WWE Network offers. They also offer NXT, old shows and exclusives.
    And so Bryan didn't win, big whoop. Cena wins almost every time but does that mean we're going to riot? (We never do btw)

    If they don't give the fans "what they want" why did they make Bryan the WHC at last years Wrestlemania? Is it too much for them to book someone they want for a change? I mean, it's not the end of the world if he's not WHC, Cena is doing fine, Orton was doing fine, what make Bryan so special? Is it so much of a big deal that we have to give the WHC to a two time WWE WHC guy rather than a fresh and upcoming star?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1

  8. You're going under the assumption that I'm crying that DB didn't win. I'm not. I'm fine with other people winning, I think the match could have been done better though.
    And I don't expect that everyone should get what they want, always- it's impossible for one.
    IMO Reigns is't the greatest choice as he needs work- but maybe his in-ring arsenal and mic skills might improve way above my expectations by Mania.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Not for the outcome last night but the fact my internet is amazing and live streams are dreadful still.
     
  10. Nah, I don't think you're crying. lol
    I also agree that Bryan shouldn't have gone out the way he did, but I'm also pointing out there's no reason to boo the entire match based off one person getting eliminated.
     
  11. dude, who are you to say that fans don't have a reason to boo the whole match? They can if they so choose and if their favorite wrestler, clearly being DB, gets tossed out like a piece of trash, they should be vocal about it bro.

    I'm not saying we should all cancel the WWE network. But, what happened was bs and everyone knows it whether they're Bryan haters or not. Bryan is very popular and I don't see that changing any time soon. Like I've seen several people on these threads say, he's like the modern day popularity level of the The Rock or Stone Cold.
     
  12. Just think if a lot of people do follow the movement of cancelling the network all we will hear is "Get the WWE Network for only $9.99" "Why spend $55 when you can spend $9.99, you do the math" If more people cancel expect a lot more of this, Anyway everyone know's WWE Network will get a huge boost at WM anyway.
     
  13. I'm not mad about the Rumble, but people should be cancelling their subscriptions a long time ago lol
     
  14. Boo if you want, just know that you're an annoying shithead that ruined watching a match I enjoy watching. The first time I'm actually looking forward to a WWE edited version DVD. I wasn't happy that Batista won the rumble last year. Doesn't mean I'm going to go to depth and cancel my subscription. That's like me watching a TV Show, not liking that they killed off a character I liked and calling the entire show shit. Then I go on and stop supporting the show with the hashtag. #CancelThisShow

    Daniel Bryan is 33, don't you think he has a ton of time becoming the WWE World Heavyweight Champion? What the fuck is wrong with him losing a match now? I already stated previously that it's a dumb idea to eliminate him early, but what are you going to do? Fucking stop production and redo the whole shot? No, move on with your life. If you dislike one outcome, don't become a retard and hate on the whole product entirety. It's like people try and forget that Daniel Bryan beat Cena clean for the title, or HHH clean OR Randy Orton and Batista CLEAN for the title again. But nope, we want Bryan to win the rumble because he is the "supposed" underdog!
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  15. I just stated that I don't support cancelling my subscription over this bro. I do support fans booing when they wanted a certain star to either win or do better than he did....clearly WWE made a mistake and the fans responded. Again, if he was in the top 4, at a minimum, wouldn't have been as bad. You need to read my whole post, not parts.

    Roman Reigns is 29....he has tons of time as well...I can use the same argument ;) yes, it's a dumb idea to eliminate him early....we are in agreement. I'm not in agreement with the fact that you feel fans booing the rumble is stupid. It's not and they have every right to do so. It was bs and they screwed up big time.

    No one has forgotten DB successes at all. I think we sometimes also fail to realize that DB was shot down all throughout 2013 by Orton and the Authority. Only to make it to the Rumble, not compete in the match, and then lose to Bray the same night. They only decided to throw Bryan in Mania because Batista didn't go over well as a face and Punk was gone. He was a filler that worked out. They still tried to make him out to be nothing is my point, much like they're clearly doing again :)

    You make some good points and I get your logic, but you're missing keys elements as well.
     
  16. No I wouldn't. Outside of the outcome of the Rumble being predictable, the rest of the matches were solid and entertaining from my perspective. If they want to cancel it after one PPV then let them.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. This is why I love you. Believe that!
    [​IMG]
    I don't understand how the people who wanted Bryan to win are the "only" fans. I'm pretty sure some of us wanted Reigns to win and surprisingly, some of us were satisfied with the PPV.

    As for Reigns being 29, you'd rather them have a developed Daniel Bryan beat Lesnar rather than an upcoming Roman Reigns? Makes no sense to me. So no, it's not really the same argument. He wasn't shot down all of 2013, he was the main focus of that time until Wrestlemania. I think people fail to realize that. (Excluding a mini feud with Bray)

    So lets say WWE did change the storyline in favor for Bryan. Does that mean they should do it every time, because I hell as don't want to see a fucking pre-planned outcome change because of salty fans that can't taking some booking decisions. If it was REALLY bad, I would complain, but it wasn't. Some of the shit WWE does is stupid, but Reigns winning IMO wasn't one of them.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. I don't understand how the people who wanted Bryan to win are the "only" fans. I'm pretty sure some of us wanted Reigns to win and surprisingly, some of us were satisfied with the PPV.

    never once said that we're the only fans. I would've preferred Bryan winning. However, didn't mind the Reigns win. Just didn't want my boy belittled as he was.

    As for Reigns being 29, you'd rather them have a developed Daniel Bryan beat Lesnar rather than an upcoming Roman Reigns? Makes no sense to me. So no, it's not really the same argument. He wasn't shot down all of 2013, he was the main focus of that time until Wrestlemania. I think people fail to realize that. (Excluding a mini feud with Bray)

    As of right now, yes I'd rather have DB fight Brock at Mania. That's like saying you wouldn't have wanted Stone Cold pushed several times when he was way over with the fans...of course I wanted him pushed. I think that because DB's reign was cut short and he's still very popular, he should be the one to fight Brock. Again, don't mind Roman, just prefer DB. Plus, DB would make a much better match. And it really is the same argument. You argued age and so did I. lol, bro watch all of the main events in 2013 where DB headlined....he was always shot down. Except for the one time he fought CEna.

    Not every time....but DB winning at the Rumble again isn't the end of the world is it? Never said Reigns winning was bad...geesh.
     
  19. Reigns is nowhere near the level of D-Bry, yet after they tried to fuck D-Bry over last year (but The YES Movement happened), they decided to put Reigns in the main event again? This is hoping that Reigns isn't boo'd heavily and improves a lot by then and can put on a great main event match with Lesnar. Hoping. Bryan has the talent and experience, he didn't get his proper title run and now he doesn't get to wrestle in what would be the match most people want to see because it would be one of the best professional wrestlers in the world against The Beast Incarnate - this is a once in a lifetime kind of match, Bryan vs Lesnar. The only time it would've happened and Vince opts to try and salvage Reigns.
     
  20. 1. Okay, so that's really just favoritism in your end.

    2. So his push was cut short. Lets say if he got injured again, what would we do? Make the same thing go on at next years Rumble and have shitty fans complain again? I never said "Main Event" I said "Main Focus". Two different things. And once again, favoritism.

    3. Never did I imply you said it, but you're basing it off favoritism, I'm basing it off booking.