Danny and I got into a quick little silly group feud where he brought up Mick Foley. Then I said Mick Foley is equal to Daniel Bryan, which I then proceeded to say we'll debate it in another thread. Well here it is Anyway who do you guys think is the better superstar? Daniel Bryan undoubtedly beats Foley in athleticism, but Foley definitely is one of the best storytellers when it comes to wrestling. I've never seen a match with either of these guys where I say "I'm bored". Their styles of wrestling are complete opposites, but one could say they are on equal grounds. They're both underdogs and highly regarded by fans as you will find very few people who hate them from my experiences. So who do you think is the better superstar?