Anyone else hate this 'logic' ? It seems like this is WWE's go to way to 'set up feuds', especially in the midcard where it happens at least 90% of the time we get a title change. How does this make sense? 1.) More of the champion jobbing, which is fucking dumb. 2.) Why not just have the guy go over in an initial title match? Would be less telegraphed at least, and you don't have to have the champ job THREE times (Non title match, title match, rematch clause) Honestly though, why should a mid card champ compete in non-title matches? World champs I can see, but IC/US champs? For what reason are they in a match and the title isn't on the line? It doesn't make any sense. It also happens a lot in the tag division. "oh man, a win over the champs puts them right in the title picture!!!" errr, no, it should make them champions... Most recently obviously this is the formula they used to have Kofi take the belt from Cesaro. So does anyone else hate this as much as or do, or are you guys cool with it?