group names

Discussion in 'Suggestions & Questions' started by Aidsey Amore, Sep 4, 2012.

  1. How about at least giving us in groups bold names, so it can be shown that we aren't just new users. Since names like Hollywood D'Z and AidsJohnson will get a lot of hits (who wouldnt click those) it will give nWo a chance to at least showoff that we are a group and not just new/old members without upgrades.
     
  2. In theory, it doesn't sound like a bad idea, actually. I hate my username looking like I'm a new user on the list of who's online and all that, but I hate not having my nWo userbar if I change to display Legend or Superstar. Bold names for groups seems like a decent compromise.
     
  3. Bold text on its own isn't really that much more noticeable:

    [​IMG]

    I agree with the idea of segregating groups from regular members though, maybe just a slight colour tint and bold for group members:

    [​IMG]

    I understood why Crayo thought the "who's online" box looked like a rainbow sponge when all of the groups had strong, separate colours, but I see no problem with the colour being faint.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Both work great IMO, nice job, me.
     
  5. Subtle segregation is a better idea than obvious segregation in my opinion. It makes the place seem more unified to new members. I think a subtle distinction and the group member only area is solid enough. Maybe add a hot tub or something, that'd be cool.
     
  6. Will do the second one actually, that looks really good. Need you to chuck me the hex code.
     
  7. Code:
    	font-weight: bold;
    	color: #8394A6;
    
     
  8. You do it the gay way like Xanth -.-.

    Will do that now, no idea why we're talking here and not on Skype. Noob. Suggestion accepted, closed.
     
  9. Efficient way, you mean? Adding a 'usergroup' class to the name style for all the groups means you only need to edit the colour in one place in the future.