WrestleMania HIAC Stipulation

Discussion in 'PPV's & Specials' started by stonecoldsamadams, Mar 22, 2016.

  1. What do you think about the stipulation added to Shane vs Taker? If Taker loses than he must retire. To me it makes sense for the storyline to give Taker more of a motive to win. But in reality we all know for sure that's there's no way in hell that Takers career will be ended by Shane McMahon. I think Taker would want to give someone will more long gevity and a solid wrestling career the honors. Plus I'm pretty sure Taker is doing a whole European tour after Mania. So that pretty much ruins the whole outcome of the HIAC match.
     
  2. Completely forgot to comment on this on my RAW rating post but given the oportunity in this thread I'll say this:

    While I can understand how this may add to the storyline as stonecoldadams mentions above, giving Taker an actual reason to want to participate in this match, at the same time it could be the dumbest stipulation ever. I mean, if Shane were to actually win, he gains full control of Monday Night Raw, right? If that's the case, wouldn't he be able to just...rehire Taker?

    Once more, WWE at it's best....
     
    • Agree Agree x 1