Idea For Booking Brock/Punk At Wrestlemania XXX

Discussion in 'General WWE' started by Lockard 23, Oct 14, 2013.

  1. We know there is a huge possibility of Punk and Brock battling in a rematch, with Punk going over. We also know that there are rumors of Punk winning the Rumble and winning the WWE Title at Wrestlemania next year. And we know there are rumors on top of those that Brock might win the WWE Title (or possibly the WHC, who knows) at some point. This idea is me combining all of those possibilities into one.

    Firstly, Daniel Bryan wins the WWE Title at Hell In A Cell in two weeks and Triple H realizes he needs someone else to get the job done against Daniel Bryan since Orton failed and so he puts other challengers in Bryan's way for Survivor Series and TLC, but Bryan still comes out on top as champion. And then as we build towards the Royal Rumble, Triple H says he's finally found the person he thinks would be the perfect choice for being the next WWE Champion and the new face of the company - Brock Lesnar.

    Here, some might say, "Shouldn't Triple H still have issues with Brock Lesnar and even Paul Heyman? After all, from what we saw at Night Of Champions, he still had some slight issues with Curtis Axel, so just imagine how he still feels about Lesnar." Well, the rationale is that you are always supposed to put what's "best for business" ahead of everything else, and sometimes that requires putting your ego and personal issues with someone (past or present) aside because it's right for business. Triple H did the same with Randy Orton and Vince himself told Vickie Guerrero (during her evaluation on Raw a few months ago) that despite what Lesnar did to him, he thought, for business reasons, that re-signing Lesnar was a "stroke of genius." So Triple H putting aside his issues with Lesnar and realizing (and knowing from first hand experience) what a beast Brock is and how valuable he would be as the premier superstar of WWE is the perfect move for business in his eyes. He can even bring up Brock's comments back from 2012 when Lesnar first returned and how Brock said the company needed someone like him as the face of it.

    Anyway, the result of this is Daniel Bryan/Brock Lesnar for the WWE Title at the Royal Rumble, which results in Lesnar winning the belt. Whether it's clean (probably isn't) or not is irrelevant, what matters is that Punk (who would have began feuding with the HHH regime by this point) wins the Rumble match on the same night, and from there, we start building towards Bryan/HHH as well as Punk/Lesnar for the WWE Title at Wrestlemania (Cena/Undertaker can main event over both matches.) It's a cool thing because Heyman has said on-screen a couple of times that he always wanted to be there when Punk main evented Wrestlemania and won the WWE Championship. The thing is, he WILL be there, but in the opposite corner, and he's gonna blow a gasket and be in so much mental torment when Punk not only defeats Lesnar but wins the belt in the process.

    The card probably won't end up like this as Rock might return after all to wrestle Lesnar, but this is a idea on how everything could work out and a cool way to book a Punk/Lesnar rematch and raise the stakes as compared to their previous match.
     
  2. It's a nice way to go. Nice touch with Heyman being there for Punk winning the belt at WM too.
     
  3. I am hoping for a title unification match at WM30 so I hope they find a different way for Punk v Brock.
     
  4. I like idea! but I am havly against rematchest it would be like brock fend of last year ownly for the title. feud with the same guy he vs. at ss and wm29 last year with hhh.
     
  5. hope in one hand and shit in the other. WWE has no interest in unifying the titles
     
  6. They probably will at some point. Maybe not at Wrestlemania XXX, though. Unless Cena winning the WHC at Hell In A Cell is meant to boost it's prestige to make it seem like an equal to the WWE Title again so that the unification match next year at Mania will seem as big as possible, but I doubt it.
     
  7. Nice idea, but can we really take more Punk v Heyman? Let's hope it ends at HIAC. Brock v Punk is done.

    As for WM30 booking, as long as we don't get a part timer vs part-timer match (Taker/Brock/Rock) I'll be pleased.

    Also, I doubt Cena's return at HIAC in a WHC title match will have any affect over who he faces at WM. Facing ADR is just a way to get him on the card vs one of company's most credible heels.
     
  8. I dont want them to unify titles instead it would be real nice if they make WHC of same level as WWE title..
    As of Wrestlemania XXX it would be good for a fatal 4 way match of Punk vs Brock vs Cena vs Rock
    :yes:I know that it is hardly possible but what harm in thinking.......