Crayo brought this subject (only the other way around) up in the RAW section. I found it interesting and decided to shamelessly steal it and post it here ( I L Y Craybear) Basically. If you could take one aspect of the WWE and apply it to TNA, what would it be? There are a lot of differences between the two companies and it could garner some interesting discussion and content. For discussions sake I'll ask that you please try to avoid saying "money" or "production value" because quite honestly those are no brainers, who wouldn't want to see TNA actually have the financial capacity of the WWE or its production team/budget? I'd personally like to bring over their ability to debut new wrestlers strongly. Out of all the new guys debuted recently in TNA the only one who has really been booked strongly in my book is King. In the E lately we have seen The Shield, Cesaro and Sandow debut very strongly and finding ways to stay relevant. The only one to fail has been Dallas. Imagine if TNA had continued to keep Ryan relevant after his tag team with Morgan died, or York. TNA seems to forget that they have newer talent on the roster at times. I'm not saying WWE is perfect in this either but they seem to at least currently be handling it better.