I read online today that Dean Ambrose is like 10 days or something away from breaking MVP's US title reign record. Dean Ambrose literally has only defended his title like once, right? As much as I love the guy, and as much as I can go on for hours saying how much better he is in every way than MVP, is it fair to have Ambrose break that record when he's really not been put in a situation to help the division at all? I understand the US title is literally a nuisance to Ambrose's career and nobody cares about it at all, but having that record still means he has a record... I am the biggest Ambrose mark but even I can admit that it's pretty unfair to those who have had better reigns to crown him as the longest US title holder. Actually, fuck that, Dean Ambrose > anyone else, so he can have that record. In a few years time when he is considered a potential GOAT alongside Stone Cold, people will see what he brought to that US title division. #Ambrose4Lyf Vote in the poll, and post your answer.