IS JOHN CENA TRULY IN THE LEVEL OF UNDERTAKER OR HHH

Discussion in 'RAW' started by shrayan, Jun 28, 2012.

  1. I HAVE NOTICED THIS GUYS, I MEAN IN EVERY BIG - MATCH SITUATION LIKE CENA VS HHH, CENA VS BATISTA JOHN CENA DOESN'T TAKE IT TO THE NEXT LEVEL I'M STARTING TO THINK WHETHER HE HAS EARNED THIS SPOTBY JUST KISSING MR.MCMAHONS ASS REMEMBER CM PUNK SAYING " CENA'S NOTHING BUT AN ASS-KISSER AND THAT'S WHY HE HAS BEEN THE GUY HE IS TODAY". SO I MAY BE WRONG BUT I HAVE DISCUSSED THIS WITH A LOT OF FRIENDS OF MINE BUT THEY HAVE AGREED WITH ME SO I THOUGHT I SHOULD ASK YOU. WHAT IS YOUR THOUGHT
     
  2. Cena is better than Taker or HHH
     
  3. I wouldn't say he is at the level of Taker or Trips because i wouldn't want to pissed off any Cena marks on here but IMO I think Taker & Trips is 100% better then Cena and his 5 moves
     
  4. His position has nothing to do with asslicking, I've never understood that. Is he at the level of Undertaker? Probably not at the moment, but when he retires he sure as hell will be whether his haters like it or not.
     
  5. Problem is, Taker has been around for years, and IMO one of the greats, I like Cena, but I do think he has a bit of a way to go to match the likes of Taker and HHH.
     
  6. In the overall scheme of things, he is really already at their level and maybe past it. Sure, he's not as great of a worker (in general) as they are, but he's been the top face of the WWE for a longer period of time than either of them have. Like it or not (and I don't), if he retired today, he's probably be in the top 10 wrestling superstars of all time.
     
  7. Depending on what criteria.. For the legendary status, no, but for the company status, he has surpassed both HHH and Taker. Cena is the face of the WWE, something Taker or HHH never was.
     
Verification:
Draft saved Draft deleted