Leave of Absence

Discussion in 'IWT Archives' started by catlady, Feb 23, 2013.

  1. Leave of Absence:

    If you are not able to, or do not plan on being active for longer then 2 weeks on the forum, please let me know here.


    If you are not able to, or do not plan on being active for longer then a month and you are a champion, please be aware that if you have contenders battling in any #1 contender matches and you are not available to be here to participate in taking on the #1 contender, we will have to strip you of your title and put it back up for contending against. This is only fair to others who are participating.

    Anyone who holds a belt and is absent for longer then 3 weeks without notifying me or @jonathan will automatically be stripped.


    PPV's are when champions will be putting their titles up for contending and these happen every 4 to 6 weeks. If you are not able to participate, it is only fair that the belt is stripped so people who are participating have a shot at winning them.

    If you are a champion and know you will not be here to take on your apponent(s) and wish to have your belt's vacancy be a certain way (having a certain promo battle, prediction poll, ect. to award the new belt holder) this is fine but you must notify me or Jonathan is advance.

    I hope you all understand.

    If you have any questions, please feel free to ask! :otunga:
     
  2. I will not be on here on the 24th and I will likely not be on here till late night, after Raw on the 25th.
    I may not be on that much tomorrow either (23rd)
    Just giving everyone the heads up. So @jonathan will be in charge!
     
  3. I'm usually not on Monday - Thursday cause of work.
     
  4. That's fine as long as you do your promo battles when they come up. Its only once a month. PPV's are on weekends anyways, so I'd imagine championship battles will be done on Saturdays or Sundays.
     
  5. Noted @Britanica
     
  6. :awyeah: Due to the IWT wellness policy, you've lost your #1 contenders match :otunga:
     
  7. You just lost your push for the WWE title, you will be jobbing to Goldhand next week :bury: :kiss:
     
  8. I may or may not be back on later. If not, if anyone has questions, you know who to ask. :boss1:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. :haha: you need those rules to keep that title off my waist, you pussy.
     
  10. I just need to break you down, so I can rebuild you in my image.
     
  11. This forum is barely active as is, and doing this is ridiculous. I will be gone 2 weeks, and then possibly a week a month later for Vacation. To hold people to this is outrageous, and show's the lack of leadership between @Britanica and @Jonathan . Neither of you were FNW, and have no idea how unfair it is to expect people to be on daily.

    Every poster here who hasn't posted in IWT in 3 days now deserves to be held to that precedent you have set.
     
  12. I didn't even see the 3 day thing, that's a bit OTT.

    If you're not going to be online to defend your title then what's the problem?

    Only people who are regular's or know they're going to come on like once a week should even think about challenging for a title.
     
  13. :lol1: so must stupidity. This forum is built as a part time fun area, you bitch about people wanting non-title feuds then demand people post daily on the area, :pity2:

    I've never seen you in FNW, and know you were selected as VP because we all know you wouldnt be in here otherwise. I dont have shit until march 24th, when i face from. This is how WWE should be, If you want me to be posting/facing others this week, i challenge you.

    You vs me, RAW next week, promo battle. It'll be a good warmup to face From.
     
  14. Lol no one is saying you have to post/face people every day/week?

    It's saying if you know you're not going to be around when there's a title match let us know here so we don't just think you're not available and you lost your title.

    We're not saying you have to face people each week.
     
  15. Ahh i misread then, i assumed you meant shouldn't be here since it actually completes the sentence.

    Either way, are you accepting my challenge? :pity:
     
  16. OH HEL NO!!!!
     
  17. I meant that to say 3 weeks not days lol and I changed it to two weeks. I think that seems fair. Its more or less for people who have titles. Just to keep this area moving.
     
  18. Since most of you do not like this. I will get rid of it. :otunga:
     
  19. But if you don't let anyone know and you're stripped of your title because you haven't posted for weeks, don't complain to us.