JR talked on his blog recently about the possibility of seeing Lesnar vs Punk II at Wrestlemania 31: http://www.wrestlingrumors.net/jim-...ock-lesnar-title-match-wrestlemania-31/29447/ Obviously the set-up for this match would be Punk returning as a surprise entrant in the Royal Rumble match and winning, and then going on to defeat Brock Lesnar for the WWE World Heavyweight Championship at WM31. Even though I expect Punk back at some point (and wouldn't even be shocked if he returned as early as next year), clearly the odds of this particular scenario happening are astronomically low, but a more interesting question is, who would actually PREFER to see this happen over any other alternative? Not saying that I do, but it wouldn't be the worst idea in the world. Giving the rub of defeating Brock Lesnar to a guy who walked out on them because he didn't get his way sounds like a terrible idea, but oh boy, wouldn't that be an ironic thing to complain about seeing as how Brock Lesnar walked out on them in 2004 and yet was given the luxury of ending the Streak as a part-timer a whole ten years later. There would at least be an interesting story behind it, what with them being connected to Paul Heyman, and with Heyman being able to say, "You couldn't defeat Brock Lesnar before and Brock even had to go and do what you failed to do the previous year and that was end the Undertaker's streak... what leads you to believe you have even the slightest chance of surviving now?"