Old PPV Returning - WOO

Discussion in 'PPV's & Specials' started by Crayo, Mar 11, 2012.

  1. PWInsider

    I'm so fucking glad.
  2. I actually started celebrating when I seen the thread title ! Is it replacing Money in the Bank?
  3. I presume so. Although, even though I'm a big fan of removing MITB, I'd much rather it be "Bragging Rights" that gets removed.
  5. I've never watched a bragging rights pay-per-view so I can't comment. Though out of the gimmick ones I have watched I would prefer it to be Hell in a Cell. Hate it with a passion.
  6. I don't see a big deal around in this PPV being brought back. Some people are so happy and I don't know why. It's not like if they use a old PPV name it will go back to being that good.
  7. I remember this name from ages ago. Does that Cyber Sunday thing still happen?
  8. Same here RĀ“Albin!
    *HBK dance*

    Damn, how awesome is this! Wooooo! This is soo exiting!
  9. They need to bring back more of the old PPVs.
  10. Bragging Rights is where SmackDown vs RAW happens. A random 5-man tag-team match is made with RAW and SmackDown superstars going head to head. What do they win? Bragging Rights... it's terrible. All feuds are practically pushed aside. It's a PPV which doesn't make sense, lol.

  11. Surely if you're going to do that you do it at Survivor series? How pointless?

    What was wrong with the old lineup!?!?!? Grr!!!
  12. It's pointless anywhere, since the teams are always full of heels. Why would heels want to work in a team to help the brand?
  13. Agreed, heels should only want to help themselfs to a top position.
  14. I never understood why they didn't have who ever remains on the winning team gets a world title shot at the next PPV. At least there is some motive there. It's the same as those draft matches, say you're a heel why would you go all out to win then celebrate when say Orton gets drafted to your brand? It doesn't make sense as you'd want as little competition as possible surely.
  15. Title shot is a good idea seabs.
    And for the draft, why would it be bad? Maybe it will be a chance to see Orton get defeated sometimes?
  16. The draft I meant more from a kayfabe point of view why would you want one of the best wrestlers to be on your brand if you're a heel? Surely you'd want the worst ones so you can get closer to winning the world title.
  17. Good point. I never thought of it like that. Suppose they couldn't have it face vs face all night though. The heels need an incentive to win.

    All the winners get to compete in a over the top rope battle royal at the end of the night, winner getting a title shot?
  18. Exactly. Things like that remind me it's fake which is something you don't want to be reminded of when watching.
  19. On that side, I agree. I just misunderstood.
  20. Okay, that's all well and good, but what happens to Elimination Chamber?