On a scale from 1 to 10, would you mark

Discussion in 'General WWE' started by Jose Tortilla, Nov 11, 2012.

  1. So, just a normal RAW or SD episode, we've had some matches and in all of a sudden:

    :yay: PTP!! So, PTP doing their entrance and stuff.

    Then, they are in the ring starting a segment about them being a great tag-team, and about their money, etc..

    But then..





    8/10 for me. Would be a damn good feud. I never got tired of Cryme Tyme, they had the skill as a team and they were over as hell.

    I'd mark. :obama:
  2. I'd mark as well.

    :laugh: they were epic
  4. PTP >>>>>>> Cryme Tyme
  5. Not the point here.

    Go back up, and reat the OP again, and comment.

  6. Okay.

    PTP >>>>>>> Cryme Tyme
  7. DUDE!!

    • Like Like x 1
  9. To answer the question, i'd say 6/10. It could be an interesting feud, even though I thought Cryme Tyme were pretty cheesy and lame.
  10. I would mark... Down on my calendar that its the day i lost all respect for Vinnie Mac. Crime time was entertaining at times but only outside the ring. Didn't like them at all in the squared circle (Wtf is circle about a square?). And now jtg is a squash match specialist anyway.

    On a scale I'd say 10/10...pissed off scale. I'd rather see the usos or another tag team get the push.

    ~Three Said That~
  11. It would be interesting for a one night thing or just a couple of weeks. If they drag on a feud then I would lose interest. Prime Time Players have more talent in my opinion.
  12. its funny for a matchup.. the charismatic team that cant wrestle.. or the wrestling team with no charisma....
  13. 3/10 Cryme Time were so dull IMO.