Punk/Cena news - Possibility we won't see a triple threat?

Discussion in 'RAW' started by Jonathan, Feb 21, 2013.

  1. http://www.sescoops.com/ryback-turning-heel/

    Crayola won't be happy.
     
  2. Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat

    1) Source is Meltzer
    2) Punk & Cena don't need to go head to head in a triple-threat
     
  3. RE: Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat

    Wish we had a way to always post when it's meltzer.

    I am assuming cena is going to finish off punk, and rocky will be involved somehow right after, but i would KILL for Punk to go over cena clean, or even Ryback take cena out (punk wouldnt see it comign) on monday to set up Ryback Cena and Punk Rocky.
     
  4. Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat

    Jonathan presenting dirtsheet news as facts per usual. Awesome.
     
  5. RE: Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat

    You've been posting Meltzer crap all morning.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. RE: Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat

    It's crap that fuels discussion :phew:

    I don't see this as "almost a certainty" that we get no triple-threat. I think last week after RAW we would have been saying it's almost a certainty we would see one. It depends on Undertaker's health and whether WWE want to simply run a repeat Wrestlemania with "Twice in a lifetime."

    I'm sure WWE backstage weren't liking the casuals tweeting and mocking them over their "once in a lifetime" crap last year, and I'm sure they won't expect the sales record to be broken with simply another match which was already disappointing last year. Furthermore, what content material do Cena and Rock have now?
     
  7. RE: Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat

    Have you seen the advertisments and poster for Mania. It's all Rock/Cena. The triple threat is not happening.
     
  8. RE: Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat

    Can you post those? Please make sure they are official ones.
     
  9. Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat

    Just started a FIFA match, give me 10 minutes.
     
  10. RE: Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat

    As I say on every post, Meltzer's the most reliable dirtsheet because he's consistently wrong. Triple threat, here we come.

    But seriously, everything you said is exactly right. As always. WWE put off the Heyman/Punk stuff until next week to give Taker one last week to see if he can go. The plan is probably "Twice in a Lifetime", the triple threat is the backup to get Punk on the card.

    As you say, Rock and Cena sucking last year won't keep it from drawing again (casuals don't care about match quality), but unless the match is Taker/Michaels quality you can't draw off a dream match twice unless something changes. Turn Cena heel, have Rocky join Heyman's faction, then we'll talk. But that's not happening, so let's not.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  12. Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat *LOLMELTZER*

    All these ads are old. You honestly expect WWE to pump out new posters for X amount of dollars because Undertaker cannot appear and they need a new match for Punk this close to the event?
     
  13. Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat *LOLMELTZER*

    BORK SMASH
     
  14. C=3

    I wasn't abusing any power, I imagine the majority of people who posted on this thread wouldn't have even bothered entering if they were warned it was Meltzer.
     
  15. RE: Almost a certainty that Punk won't be in a triple threat *R'ALBIN ABUSES HIS PO

    Okay then. Sure. Okay.
     
  16. I luv you Mcmahon.
     
  17. The last two posts (above Test's...) confuse me, but anyway.... I'll make my two thoughts simple and to the point since there's no reason to echo some of what others have said.

    1.) I still find myself hoping for the triple threat match since I don't really care to see just Cena/Rock again.
    2.) I can see WWE not advertising Punk on the Mania promotional materials either because a.) they didn't want to spoil it ahead of time or (and more likely) b.) they originally planned it with those three big draws and didn't include Punk because they were still hopeful of a Punk/Taker match, so now they wouldn't re-do them so close to the event.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. Well, Brock is on that poster as well. Should we therefore assume that it will be a triple threat involving Brock? That poster was just the WWE showing off their three biggest draws to help summarize what a huge event Wrestlemania will be.

    If a triple threat happens at all, they probably didn't put Punk on the poster because it hasn't been officially announced that Punk is gonna be involved. 2+2=4 sort of logic.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. Pretty sure we're getting the Triple Threat.
     
  20. DUDE DON'T DOUBT THE POSTER, IT'S OBVIOUSLY ILLUMINATIT AND THE WWE WORKING TOGEVER #HIDEINPLANESITE

    (Yeah you're right again.......)

    ps stop being so right all the god damn time.