Hola, I'm curious as to why WWE and other sites seem to think that reigns was going to beat Brock at mania 31?? I just read yet another article where its portrayed as if reigns had the beast beat... But, in reality, he didn't. Brock seemingly had reigns beat. He not only beat his ass like the whole match, but then Brock just nailed a 4th F5, then both men collapsed. Rollins then came out and got involved. But, even though Brock had the edge throughout the whole match, here's what WWE.com says: "The Big Dog has had eight months to replay the final moments of WrestleMania 31 in his head. Reigns was seemingly on the verge of conquering Brock Lesnar and capturing the WWE World Heavyweight Championship, until Seth Rollins stole his WrestleMania moment — and the title — by cashing in his Money in the Bank contract and going on to pin Reigns." Did we all not see the same match? Brock was seem finely going to win, not reigns. Reigns gave Brock his toughest challenge yet, but in no way did he seem like he was going to win? Is it just me? Or am I wrong?