Rematch clauses

Discussion in 'General WWE' started by Karaoke Of Cosmos, Mar 26, 2013.

  1. #1 Karaoke Of Cosmos, Mar 26, 2013
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2016
    What are every ones opinion on this? I really hate this if you lose the title you should get back to the end of the line.

    I want to see fresh feuds and i feel this just stops that, look at Christian vs Orton and Show vs Del rio. ****s
     
  2. I am okay with them if they get them out of the way early. If you drag a rematch clause out for a long time there better be a good feud lined up to justify it. It seems somewhat logical that the former champ gets a shot at the new one but I also see your point.
     
  3. I actually hate the rematch clauses cuz you know that the guy is not tacking the belt back
     
  4. I hate rematch clauses. It sort of leads to a pseudo burial of the champ after he drops the belt, which really can stunt the growth of the mid card when you have a guys having to re-job to a mid carder when they are ready to move up to the main event scene.
     
  5. I don't think it should be done all the time, not a fan.