SmackDown Smackdown Spoilers: April 26

Discussion in 'SmackDown' started by Snowman, Apr 23, 2013.

  1. prowrestling.net

    NO ZIGGLER AGAIN?

    Kinda odd how it said "this concludes Smackdown". Some sites are saying Taker/Ambrose will be part of the show, some say it won't. Odd. Tune in Friday to find out.

    Really hope it is obviously, that's really all there is to look for on this show. Typical Smackdown.
     
  2. Wheres the WHC champ?
    Also great, a Foley DVD looking forward to buy it
     
  3. Honestly don't know whether to be angry at no Ziggler or fapping at Ambrose/Undertaker :fap: :fap:
     
  4. Good! taker took the triple Powerbomb just like I told him to in the other thread. That's the only reason for him to be involved. To put them over.
     
  5. Swagger/Del Rio actually sounds very good. Show/Henry matches seem meh, most likely it's a Show and Henry/Sheamus and Orton feud soon? And Ambrose/Undertaker is :yay: :yes: I think the match is part of the show, since Ambrose did tout it earlier in the show. I'd give this a 6/10 for spoilers.
     
  6. Show Spoiler

    [​IMG]
    Raw recaps? ON MY SMACKDOWN?!


    Show Spoiler

    [​IMG]
    Sounds dandy, but how many times can we see those two in a match



    Show Spoiler

    [​IMG]


    Show Spoiler

    [​IMG]

    Show Spoiler

    [​IMG]

    Show Spoiler

    [​IMG]

    Show Spoiler

    [​IMG]


    Show Spoiler

    [​IMG]

    Show Spoiler

    [​IMG]


    Show Spoiler

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 6
  7. Liking because of the last gif.
     
  8. Is it bad that I'm actually a wee bit annoyed Ambrose tapped? Of course it's bad, it's Undertaker, it does no damage. But I liked the undefeated stuff (I know they still are, but yeah, :sad:). Otherwise, I'm so so so so pumped to see that match, and it HAS to be apart of the show.

    Also, the rest sounds bad. Typically bad.
     
  9. Ziggler should be competing or something, he's the WHC, do the big champions only fight in Raw?
     
  10. How absurd would it be if they didn't include that match lol. Literally the only interesting sounding part of the show.
     
  11. Would we be surprised if it wasn't? God dammit I have a bad feeling about this lol.

    Why wouldn't they promote an Undertaker one on one match on RAW though?
     
  12. Someone made a thread that The Shield should never lose as a team. So in single's matches, I could care less. Expect it to be good. :mog:
     
  13. You could care less? So you do care that they lost in singles matches then?
     
  14. Would it surprise me? Not much, a little, but not much. why wouldn't they promote it? No time to promote future events, all about recapping dem previous events
     
    • Like Like x 2
  15. Seems legit.
     
  16. I knew this would come up so I had a back up plan on what to write.
    *Dammit it's a dark match
    Don't care.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. The WHC is so damn sick of Smackdown he doesn't even appear on it.
     
  18. The announcers where apparently still sitting at their desks commenting during the taker match so it might be on TV.
     
  19. Apparently Triple H and the New Age Outlaws faced the Shield afterwards and they had the typical house show finish to that.

    All signs point to Taker/Ambrose being televised. Pretty retarded that they don't advertise that, that'll draw. Swagger vs Del Rio? lolno
     
  20. Let's cross our fingers then.