Not just who you think will win, but who you want to win. For me, both objectively and personally, I want The Rock to win. For those saying Punk deserves to beat the Rock and that him losing his long title reign to a 'part-timer' in what will only be his third match in almost a decade is disappointing, they don't realize that Punk might not (and to me, almost certainly wouldn't be) champion still if not for the Rumble match with the Rock set in stone several months ago. Does anyone think Punk would have survived HIAC with the belt if it wasn't for his upcoming match with the Rock? That was really the only thing stopping WWE from putting the belt on Ryback. (And they didn't like the idea of Ryback winning it and losing it back soon after, and it would take some luster from Rock/Punk if Punk couldn't brag about his long title reign.) He might have even lost it to Cena in the summer and might not have even turned heel in the first place. There's also no one else (other than Undertaker at Wrestlemania) that could plausibly beat Punk that Punk hasn't already run through (yes, that includes Daniel Bryan.) And I'd rather have Rock win it than Taker win it, as would probably everyone else. Punk beating Rock only to lose it to him at Elimination Chamber is also retarded, Vince Russo-like booking. Considering that, I think putting the belt on Rock is the perfect way to start the 'Road To Wrestlemania', with Punk's record breaking reign ending and Rock winning the belt for the first time in over a decade happening at the same exact time. Rock being champ also attracts more attention business-wise than Punk retaining.