The Rock Reportedly Signs Contract with WWE

Discussion in 'General WWE' started by Big Hoss Rambler, Apr 5, 2012.

  1. :gusta:
  2. Pretty expected after Rock's promo. I'm all for it as long as we don't see Rock vs Brock.
  3. they should keep in open mind. i was small when wrestlemania 13 was in chicago. Years later i find out Shawn really was supposed 2 wrestle Bret. itz good they didnt becuz the guy who replaced shawn in that match did a good job. keepin an open mind 2 other guys just in case they get popular is a good idea
  4. They can keep a year long feud going between them and make it a hit if done right and still make these guys put new/ younger guys over. For example. Have the rock and Brock compete about who can defeat most superstars in a year before facing each other. Have the some of the young guys come back for more and become harder and harder for them to beat each time and you have given these guys some credibility. Say Kofi faces Rock a couple of times and one time maybe even gets a win in. They have then built up Kofi as a guy who actually beat the rock. Something not even Cena has done.
  5. I wish I was f*cking 18 years old, I swear to god I would have already planned a trip to New Jersey for WM 29. I hate being 17 :(
  6. Going to WM 30! :)
  7. Well that is when I'm 18 years old and I'm without a doubt going to be there, Madison Square Garden baby it just can't get much better.

    With my savings so far I could go to both WM's but me being 17 just lowers the possibilites of being able to go to WM 29.

    Are you going with friends or?
  8. I said still say that should do Brock vs. Undertaker!
  9. Pretty much gives away the match that will happen Brock vs Rock
  10. I don't think it's a give away, I still think Brock vs Cena will happen instead of Brock vs Rock.