Discussion in 'General WWE' started by Prince Bálor, Jun 30, 2016.
Such a badass. I love that man.
Lol the man can literally say what he wants when he wants. I love his honesty. It might catch up with him at some point but as of now, he's got the world by the balls so to speak.
who at WWE will stop him lmao?
Vince. If he decides he's sick of shit. Brock makes Vince tons of money. But, in reality, if Vince gets pissed at Brock, he will find a way to drop him.
yeah.. Vince can fuck him up business wise, but i doubt he would do it to his face.
Brock is such a little pussy.
Lol WWE needs Brock way more than Brock needs WWE. Brock can find something else to do and make bank or he just sit back at home, hunt and bang his wife and be just fine.
He and The Rock can do/say whatever the fuck they want, and if WWE are dumb enough to drop them then lol. Good luck.
Everyone on their roster are jabronis who can't draw a dime. They need Rocks, Brocks, Takers etc.
EDIT: you're a ****
And, if Vince dropped Brock and Brock wanted to continue in pro wrestling/sports entertainment, Brock or Paul Heyman picks up a phone and calls any other promotion on the planet (probably either ROH or New Japan) and Brock's back in a wrestling ring 90 days after his release.
And don't give me the "ROH/NJPW/TNA/Any other company you want to insert here can't afford what WWE can pay Brock" argument. Vince won't fire Brock simply because every time Brock is on TV, WWE makes a huge amount of money, ratings pop, and sponsors have orgasms that spill money into WWE's bank account. If Vince got dumb enough to drop the guy and he still wanted to wrestle, he could go anywhere in the world and do it and make whatever money they could pay him just as a "fuck you" to Little Vinny.
No WWae needs to use its current talent properly as well. Letting them be more natural, not scripted.
When did I ever say anything about Brock not being able to compete elsewhere? Of course he can. That had nothing to do with my point.
My point is that WWE will let anyone go if they get mad enough. Doesn't matter if you're the rock, hogan, stone cold, Brock, etc. never said it would be smart, but making the point that he's not that "untouchable."
Please read reply to Waco kid. My point was that WWE may need Brock, yes. But he's not "untouchable"... They can drop him whenever Vince chooses. It's not like Brock walks in and tells Vince what to do. Or even triple and Stephanie for that matter. The moment that happens and he keeps doing it, he would be released. There's still a chain of command.
Be real funny if he lost and WWE drops him...
Say it to his face, fuckboy.
That'd be pretty stupid on their part since he's still one of their biggest draws. Although, if he does end up losing to Hunt, then I guess it may affect his booking come SummerSlam time.
But, if he beats Hunt, then I imagine WWE will put the WWE title back on him and whoever's the current champ (Rollins/Ambrose/Reigns), he will go BORKSMASHKILL mode on 'em at SummerSlam.
Of course, that's just my theory and I could be wrong.
Historically not true. Shawn Michaels was a drug addicted, pill smuggling, whore mongering turd, who would fuck Sunny in Vince's locker room, but he drew well, was popular and WWE relied on him to carry the company so they let him get away with everything.
He did all those things, but did you hear of him blaintly treating Vince like shit? Or his wife? Or family? No.
Shawn was awful and did what he wanted. But even he wasn't untouchable. Shawn also use to some horrible things to women as well, but let's not get sidetracked.
He did. He would belittle Vince for putting him in positions he didn't like. Nash said it himself that he would routinely Vince to "Fuck off".
HBK was a draw but doesn't nearly draw as much as Lesnar does now, so you can expect a massive amount of leeway.