...if when Sting and Undertaker wrestled at next year's Wrestlemania (assuming the match happens at all, of course... I assume it will), they ended up putting Sting over Undertaker? I have a feeling this is an incredibly likely scenario if they square off. For one, next year is almost certainly gonna be the Undertaker's final match, so it's likely that he'll put someone over in his final bout since the old adage is that you go out on your back and Undertaker is old school like that. Secondly, I don't see Sting losing two consecutive Wrestlemania matches, especially with next year's show being set in his hometown of Dallas, and going over the Undertaker will be more than enough to rectify his loss to HHH this year. I think WWE will give Sting at least one big Wrestlemania moment that involves a significant victory, don't you? And the feeling might be that since he's already come in and put someone over right out the gate, then perhaps the right thing to do is to put him over next year. I know some will say that Sting vs Undertaker sort of symbolizes the Monday Night Wars in it's own way and that they wouldn't put Sting over Taker for similar reasons that they didn't put him over HHH this year, but they don't have to market the match that way. And thirdly, well, it's just an intuition I have and my intuitions are usually correct. I know a lot of folks will probably respond by saying they don't give a shit enough about the match at this point to care either way (which is a reasonable response that I can't fully disagree with since I share similar sentiments), but for those that do care, how surprised would you be (if at all) to see them book Sting as the only other man aside from Brock Lesnar to defeat the Undertaker at Wrestlemania?