WCW should've won the war!

Who would you rather won the war?

  • WCW

  • WWE


Results are only viewable after voting.

edge4ever

The Game
Technician
5,780
2,077
793
2,913.91
Lol WWE has its run of the mill Raw show that caters heavily to the casual fans (because of money) with little tastes of truly engaging stories and matches for hardcore fans. Smackdown is little more hardcore based, while NXT caters to indie marks and freaks. 205 Live is focused on quick paced action and getting better at stories. They have tournaments that are indie and hardcore, as well as special content.

You don’t have to like everything about WWE and in some ways I get they rinse, wash, and repeat the same garbage for the sake of money, but in the same breath, they have more content and hardcore shit than ever before. The wrestling, overall, is far more superb and some of the stories are pretty good.

With that being said, saying that WWE just sucks for the past 10 years is complete bs. Comparing it in any faculty at this point to the complete Shit show that Eric ran is bs. Eric had a few moments of interest for me in WCW, but very few and far between. Again, he had some good names and lived off Hogan, Goldberg, Sting, Flair, NWO, etc. but from a booking or good wrestling stance, it was completely a 100% hit or miss.

Fuck WCW man. Lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tiger Mask

edge4ever

The Game
Technician
5,780
2,077
793
2,913.91
Have you seen the ratings? Casual fans are not watching. Casual fans only watch when the stories are good. The Harcore fans are watching because they are used to eating shit. Hardcore fans are the worst cuz they watch no matter what
Have you seen the ratings? Casual fans are not watching. Casual fans only watch when the stories are good. The Harcore fans are watching because they are used to eating shit. Hardcore fans are the worst cuz they watch no matter what
Do you know what a casual fan is? Literally what you said is the exact opposite. Haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tiger Mask

edge4ever

The Game
Technician
5,780
2,077
793
2,913.91
Have you seen the ratings? Casual fans are not watching. Casual fans only watch when the stories are good. The Harcore fans are watching because they are used to eating shit. Hardcore fans are the worst cuz they watch no matter what
That would mean that hardcore is now casual and casual hardcore Hahahaha.
 
  • LOL
Reactions: Seto-san

edge4ever

The Game
Technician
5,780
2,077
793
2,913.91
Casual fans have interest in WWE but they ain't watching every week. Most Casual watch Royal Rumble to Wrestlemania when the quality increases. Ratings are the low as fuck right now. Casual fans are not watching.
That is literally the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. A casual fan watches no matter what and is a sheep and doesn’t really care too much about quality. Hardcore watch sometimes and enjoy some stories because they love quality and are usually veterans to the product and/or have seen tons of other vendors for wrestling, etc.
 

WholeFN'Moe

The Architect
Hotshot
2,482
610
398
700.20
Lol WWE has its run of the mill Raw show that caters heavily to the casual fans
Casual fans will change the channel on WWE real quick because they try to be cool & come off as lame, if they aren't normally wrestling fans, they aren't going to watch.

truly engaging stories and matches
LOL!

Smackdown is little more hardcore based
It's a little better of a show... A LITTLE, for now, still has the stink of WWE on it though & it still sucked forever before that & it will suck again real soon, stay tuned.


NXT caters to indie marks and freaks
lol this is just funny

205 Live is focused on quick paced action and getting better at stories
The only reason it doesn't suck yet is because Vince doesn't care enough about it or smaller guys to put his shitty 2 cents in

You don’t have to like everything about WWE
Thank god because it blows in all aspects and has and will continue to do so.


Fuck WCW man. Lol.
I fucking love WCW
 
  • LOL
Reactions: edge4ever

edge4ever

The Game
Technician
5,780
2,077
793
2,913.91
Casual fans will change the channel on WWE real quick because they try to be cool & come off as lame, if they aren't normally wrestling fans, they aren't going to watch.



LOL!



It's a little better of a show... A LITTLE, for now, still has the stink of WWE on it though & it still sucked forever before that & it will suck again real soon, stay tuned.



lol this is just funny



The only reason it doesn't suck yet is because Vince doesn't care enough about it or smaller guys to put his shitty 2 cents in


Thank god because it blows in all aspects and has and will continue to do so.




I fucking love WCW
Beyond idiotic. Your vague replies, little jabs, and assumptions compared to what’s actually happening in WWE is a joke. Lol I’m done with this thread. You’re entitled to be wrong.
 
  • LOL
Reactions: WholeFN'Moe

Redboy123@

The Game
Technician
5,197
3,530
793
6,235.41
That is literally the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. A casual fan watches no matter what and is a sheep and doesn’t really care too much about quality.
Well I guess casual fan means a different thing from wherever you are from. Casual fan from where I'm from mean someone who is a fan but isn't dedicated. A casual football ban is someone who watches only a few matches a week compared to a dedicated fan who watches every match. That's why they are called casual because they are casual about there support for that team.

Someone who watches every WWE show every week are hardcore fans. Because they are hardcore fans. The clue is in the name. Casual fans mean they are casual and hardcore fans mean they are hardcore.
 

Redboy123@

The Game
Technician
5,197
3,530
793
6,235.41
Name one person from WCW and ECW to do something meaningful excluding Eddie Guerrero and Goldberg.
Why are you restricting the question? Why can't I say Eddie or Bill. Also why is your question so broad? Are you only asking for stars from WCW and ECW that came to WWE during the Invasion? Cuz if not then I can say Jericho and Benoit. Also what do you mean meaningful? RVD main evented a ppv with a 5 star classic and became WWE champion. That is pretty meaningful. Booker T had a meaningful career in WWE. What do you mean? Rey Mysterio WWE career eclipsed his WCW career. At a certain extent Big Show had a way more memorable career in WWE. Undertaker was nothing in WCW, went to WWE became an all time great. Kevin Nash infamous switch from WCW to WWE resulted in a long ass world title reign. Same with Scott Hall in 1992. Mick Foley was great in WWE, better than his time in WCW. WWE and WCW traded talent all the time. Some worked, some didn't.
 

Grievous II

Revenge Of The Cringe
Legend
14,022
13,591
2,033
20,653.62
I honestly think things worked out for the best as far as WCW goes...

I guess it would be nice if the WWE had some decent competition
in the American market...if only so they'd write/book something weird,
different & interesting instead of the Möbius strip of repetitive & tedious
booking the company dishes out week after week.

Like when was the last time the WWE actually did something exciting
apart from swapping a few performers from each show & announcing
a new GM?

Why not an NXT or 205 Live Invasion storyline?
Why not create a new, dominant faction aiming for complete brand control?
Why not do something completely left field & crazy?

No?

Okay...sorry I asked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tiger Mask

Redboy123@

The Game
Technician
5,197
3,530
793
6,235.41
Why not an NXT or 205 Live Invasion storyline?
Why not create a new, dominant faction aiming for complete brand control?
Why not do something completely left field & crazy?

No?

Okay...sorry I asked.
Why not just tell a simple story between good and evil, where fans love the face and hate the heel? WWE have forgotten how to do that
 

Seto-san

The Homicidol
Legend
24,255
9,315
2,228
11,725.15
Why are you restricting the question? Why can't I say Eddie or Bill. Also why is your question so broad? Are you only asking for stars from WCW and ECW that came to WWE during the Invasion? Cuz if not then I can say Jericho and Benoit. Also what do you mean meaningful? RVD main evented a ppv with a 5 star classic and became WWE champion. That is pretty meaningful. Booker T had a meaningful career in WWE. What do you mean? Rey Mysterio WWE career eclipsed his WCW career. At a certain extent Big Show had a way more memorable career in WWE. Undertaker was nothing in WCW, went to WWE became an all time great. Kevin Nash infamous switch from WCW to WWE resulted in a long ass world title reign. Same with Scott Hall in 1992. Mick Foley was great in WWE, better than his time in WCW. WWE and WCW traded talent all the time. Some worked, some didn't.
Why am I being restricting? Because I can, obviously. Bill and Eddie are the two everyone uses, so what not give someone different. I was asking a whole, you know, pre-invasion, "Invasion", and post-invasion. Meaningful meaning they did something that either added value to them, didn't ruin their character, or were in a story that wasn't awful, you know like Raven and DDP. RVD was over because WWF/E knew that he would be a star because of his time in ECW, so why not please the recently acquired ECW fans. Booker T had a decent career up till Triple H buried him at WM 19. The fact you knew Undertaker was in WCW impresses me, and you are right he wasn't anything there. Mick was just great no matter where he worked at because the guy is a great worker. I wouldn't say WCW and WWF/E "traded" because that implies that they had a working agreement when they didn't.
 

Grievous II

Revenge Of The Cringe
Legend
14,022
13,591
2,033
20,653.62
Why not just tell a simple story between good and evil, where fans love the face and hate the heel? WWE have forgotten how to do that
That's because the WWE doesn't know how to book their "Heroes" anymore
& are constantly having the "Villains" win all the time...making the Heroes look
weak & pathetic & drawing the fans to cheer for the villains meaning none of
the heroes can get over.

"They pray for villains...When their heroes let them down!"


Me personally...I want the Heroes to win...at least some of the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tiger Mask

Redboy123@

The Game
Technician
5,197
3,530
793
6,235.41
Why am I being restricting? Because I can, obviously. Bill and Eddie are the two everyone uses, so what not give someone different. I was asking a whole, you know, pre-invasion, "Invasion", and post-invasion. Meaningful meaning they did something that either added value to them, didn't ruin their character, or were in a story that wasn't awful, you know like Raven and DDP. RVD was over because WWF/E knew that he would be a star because of his time in ECW, so why not please the recently acquired ECW fans. Booker T had a decent career up till Triple H buried him at WM 19. The fact you knew Undertaker was in WCW impresses me, and you are right he wasn't anything there. Mick was just great no matter where he worked at because the guy is a great worker. I wouldn't say WCW and WWF/E "traded" because that implies that they had a working agreement when they didn't.
If you knew the answer then why did you ask the question. There has been multiple wrestlers that have been better in WWE then in WCW. I was right
 

WholeFN'Moe

The Architect
Hotshot
2,482
610
398
700.20
I honestly think things worked out for the best as far as WCW goes
Why? ....RAW & SD are just as bad now and have been & will continue to be.


Like when was the last time the WWE actually did something exciting
apart from swapping a few performers from each show & announcing
a new GM?
My point exactly... WCW had the potential to change if it stuck around
 
Last edited:

ThePhenom97

The Last Outlaw
Hotshot
1,335
1,114
498
4,043.66
I believe WWE would still be here if WCW won the Monday Night Wars, but WWE would have a somewhat different image...

1.It probably wouldn't be on a Monday. It probably would be on another day. Maybe on the weekends since a lot of people are off on the weekends.

2. Vince would've made sure he kept his top guys as much as possible. The Rock would've been around more and wrestled more, Brock Lesnar probably stayed if Vince gave him a better Baby-Face treatment.

3. WWE would not be PG. This basically speaks for it's self. No corny kiddy stuff will have ever happened like WWEKids.Com and other things of that nature.

4. Roman and Cena would not be Baby Faces of the company. I respect Cena and what he's done but like I said with a better baby-face treatment Brock would've probably stayed. He definitely would be one of the top guys but not the top guy. To honest not trying to hate on Roman either, but he would most likely be in the Mid Card division as US Champ as a Face or in The Main Event scene as a heel.

5. Vince would not have made his dumbest decisions. Such as Breaking the streak, Rock vs Cena II, etc.

There would more different things, but believe me WWE would still be here. It just would be somewhat different.
 

Log in

or Log in using