WWE Should Do A 40-Man Royal Rumble Match Again Next Year

Discussion in 'General WWE' started by The GOAT, Sep 18, 2015.

  1. WWE Forums is giving away a copy of WWE 2K18 for any platform! More info: WWE 2K18 Giveaway (PS4, Xbox One, Steam)
  1. Since Wrestlemania 32 is shaping up to be the biggest Wrestlemania of all time (at least that's the plan), why not have "the largest Royal Rumble match in history" for only the second time by making it a 40-man match again like in 2011? Imagine the kind of star-studded Rumble they could come up with: John Cena, Brock Lesnar, The Undertaker, maybe even HHH, Sting, Daniel Bryan, Randy Orton, Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins, Roman Reigns, The Wyatt Family (imagine Strowman in the Rumble!), Kevin Owens, The New Day, Rusev, Big Show, Kane, Mark Henry, Sheamus, Dolph Ziggler, Ryback, etc. And then whatever nostalgia appearances you can pull out on top of it as well a a person or two from NXT like Samoa Joe, Baron Corbin, etc. Has the potential to be the greatest Rumble match in history if you think about it.

    Obviously not every single one of these people would be in the Rumble, since at least two of them would have to be in the WWE World Heavyweight Championship match, but still. (Although imagine how great it would be if the title ended up vacated for some reason, and the Rumble itself was for the championship. That could be a logical reason to have a 40 man match again, and it's about high time we got another Rumble for the title anyway, since 1992 was the first and only time that's ever happened.)
    • Like Like x 2
  2. That'd be cool, 'cause we'd get to see even more guys taking naps in the corner and doing nothing interesting.
    • Like Like x 4
  3. I'm all for it. I was wondering why this didn't happen sooner. But, why not do it next year and have like everyone.
  4. 40 is too much, there isn't enough interesting talent.
  5. Probably would be the top candidate to win the damn thing
  6. The last time they did it I wasn't a fan.
Draft saved Draft deleted