People seem to believe that if Punk hadn't walked out on the company back in January, at Wrestlemania we would have gotten Punk/HHH while Orton defended the WWE World Heavyweight Championship against Batista in the main event, leaving Bryan to wrestle a heel Sheamus in the undercard. However, in hindsight, knowing that the reason Bryan was put into the championship match (and booked to win the title) was to appease all the angry Bryan marks who would have shit all over the match in the absence of Bryan's involvement, it's safe to say Bryan would have ended up in the match anyway even if Punk had stayed. The only difference is, he doesn't have to pull double duty at Wrestlemania and we get Orton/Batista/Bryan and Punk/HHH instead of Orton/Batista/Bryan and Bryan/HHH. I know people will say that that means no Bryan/HHH at Mania, which is true, but there's a pretty big certainty that we would have gotten it at Extreme Rules, especially since it was originally reported that Hunter may have gone over Punk in their match at Mania. HHH being pissed off that his "boys" Orton and Batista couldn't defeat Daniel Bryan and so now he has to assume the mantle and take the championship from him himself. It would have made for a much better main event for Extreme Rules than Bryan/Kane and one hell of a strong start to Bryan's championship reign as well. Considering all that, are you fine with the way it is now, or would it have been slightly better to get Punk/HHH at Mania (which could have been awesome granted Punk brought back some of his edge) along with Bryan's big championship win at the end and then Bryan/HHH for the first time at ER?